The Demoralization of the United Nations

The Demoralization of the United Nations

Clifford D. May

For decades, the United Nations has wasted billions of dollars, achieved little, and tolerated misconduct – the Oil-for-Food scandal and sexual exploitation by U.N. peacekeepers to take just two examples.
The U.N.’s failures have not led to serious reform, and the U.N.’s misdeeds have not led to serious penalties. Nevertheless, its bank accounts are endlessly replenished, with American taxpayers contributing the lion’s share.
But the transnational bureaucrats who run the organization do respond to some outside influences. In particular, China’s rulers have been increasingly successfully at commandeering multilateral agencies to further their unilateral ambitions.
I’m going to give you one example which I hope will make clear the depth and extent to which the U.N. has been demoralized – in the most literal sense.
Emma Reilly is an Irish human rights lawyer. In 2012, she was lucky enough – or so she thought – to get a job with the U.N. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR).
About a year later, the persecution of minorities within the borders of the People’s Republic of China began to receive a little attention. Witnesses app-lied for accreditation to testify in Geneva, where the OHCHR and the U.N. Hu-man Rights Council (UNH-RC) are headquartered.
Ms. Reilly soon became aware that U.N. staffers, in violation of U.N. rules, were secretly providing Beijing with the names of those potential witnesses, including Uyghur, Tibetan, and Hong Kong dissidents and activists. Witnesses were subsequently threatened, imprisoned, and tortured. One reportedly died while in detention. The families of witnesses were harassed.
Ms. Reilly reported all this to her superiors, including the High Commissioner for Human Rights, and the Secretary-General. She provided documentary evidence.
Her superiors were outraged – not at those tipping off Chinese officials but at Ms. Reilly for doing her job which, as she put it, was “to report deliberate endangerment of human rights activists.”
But they didn’t fire her. Initially, she figured there were two reasons for that. One: They knew she was telling the truth. Two: The U.N. has pledged to protect whistleblowers. From then on, however, she was ostracized, treated like a traitor, and given only busywork.
The OHCHR’s public response has been inconsistent. Spokesmen have den-ied handing over the names of witnesses, acknowledged that it was an ongoing practice, and claimed it was only a “limited practice,” which had ended.
Ms. Reilly appeared before U.N. tribunals but without clear results. She told her story to diplomats and government officials. Some expressed concern but none did anything.
In July of 2020, a U.N. Ethics Officer belatedly recognized Ms. Reilly as a whistleblower. Investigations against her proceeded anyway, based not on the allegation that she was lying but rather for having spoken publicly about U.N. activities without “authorization.”
In August, she wrote a letter to Linda Thomas-Greenfield, the U.S. ambassador to the U.N., requesting a meeting, emphasizing “that this is not an employment dispute, but an issue of the protection of human rights defenders against reprisals, and the ability of U.N. staff to blow the whistle on the most serious misconduct.”
Ms. Thomas-Greenfield did not respond. Last week, Ms. Reilly was fired.
“My case is not unique,” Ms. Reilly wrote on the website, UNintegrity.com. “The UN Administration cannot point to a single case of a public interest whistleblower who has been protected. Staff are fully and completely aware of that, so even most of the ethical staff members simply decide to turn the other way, knowing that their reports will not stop misconduct or lead to accountability, but merely signal the end of their own UN careers.”
She pointed out that, “there is no freedom of information and no external oversight of the UN.” That’s one reason the organization’s decadence receives little attention in the dominant media.
Another reason is that many journalists, for ideological reasons, are loath to cast aspersions on international organizations. Much of the media disputed or ignored the extent to which the World Health Organization acted as an agent of China’s rulers – increasing the damage caused by the virus that escaped from China and spread around the world.
The Trump administration withdrew from the WHO and cut off American funding. The Biden administration has rejoined and turned the dollar faucet back on, demanding no reforms in exchange.
The WHO’s director-general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, has been nominated for re-election by Germany and 16 other members of the European Union. The Biden administration has not registered disapproval. The election is slated for next May. Mr. Tedros is likely to be the only candidate on the ballot.
This just in: China has joined with Russia, Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, and other egregiously unfree states to form a new U.N. caucus. They call it the Group of Friends in Defense of the United Nations. They claim that their members “suffer from unilateral coercive measures imposed by the US and the EU…in violation of the international law and the UN Charter.”
When will American and European leaders recognize the significance of such developments and the strategic threat they pose? When will they counter efforts to subvert the U.N. and make the world safer for authoritarians, tyrants, and human-rights violators? The case of Emma Reilly is a wakeup call. American and European leaders are sleeping through it.
Follow him on Twitter @CliffordDMay.

The post The Demoralization of the United Nations appeared first on The Frontier Post.